MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559625747

Acolhimento e Serviço Social: contribuições para o aprimoramento conceitual e interventivo

2016· article· pt· W2559625747 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cláudia Priscila C. dos Santos, Regina Célia Tamaso Mioto

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociologyPublic healthCapability approachPolitical scienceNursingMedicineLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A literatura sobre o acolhimento, no âmbito da saude publica brasileira, o define como elemento que reorganiza os servicos, que garante o acesso e que estabelece vinculos. Esta subjacente as discussoes da integralidade da atencao e da humanizacao das relacoes entre profissionais e usuarios, dois principios da politica de saude do Brasil materializados pelo Sistema Unico de Saude - SUS. O estudo objetiva o levantamento e a analise das producoes cientificas sobre o tema no campo da saude publica e a identificacao da operacionalizacao do acolhimento na pratica do Servico Social, destacando as suas particularidades em meio ao trabalho das equipas multiprofissionais. A investigacao e exploratoria, de natureza qualitativa com universo formado por assistentes sociais de hospitais publicos de uma cidade do Sul do Brasil. Os dados demonstram que o acolhimento e parte integrante do processo interventivo dos assistentes sociais e objetiva o acesso aos direitos, a criacao de vinculo e a compreensao de elementos da situacao que envolve o usuario para fundamentar uma futura intervencao. Porem, considera-se que o tema nao e novo para o Servico Social. The literature about embracement, within Brazilian public health, defines it as an element responsible for the reorganization of health services, promotion of the guarantee of access and creation of links. It underlies the discussions of the integrality in care and humanization in relation between health employers and users, two principles of the Brazilian health policy, materialized through the Unified Health System - SUS. The objective of this study is bringing to the forefront and analyzing the scientific outputs regarding this theme in the field of public health and to identify the operationalization of embracement in the Social Work practice, highlighting its special features among the interdisciplinary work. The research was exploratory, of a qualitative nature and with a universe formed by social workers, from public state hospitals, located in a city in Southern Brazil. The data shows that embracement is part of the intervention process of social workers and focuses on allowing access to rights, the creation of links and the understanding of elements to plan a future intervention. However, it is considered that the theme is not new for Social Work. Palavras-chave / Keywords Acolhimento, Saude publica, Servico social, Acao profissional. Embracement, Public health, Social work, Professional intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0090.030
Scholarly communication0.0150.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207