Mathematical Modelling of Spray Combustion-Numerical and Analytical Analysis with application to Engineering Science
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present paper we applied two well- known analytical method to the problem of thermal explosion of monodisperse and polydisperse fuel spray. The methods are the method of integral manifold (MIM) and the homotopy analysis method (HAM). The MIM method used as a basic tools for the analysis of SPS system of ordinary differential equations which means that the physical/ mathematical model should contain a small parameter in the governing equations. The HAM is always valid no matter whether there exist small physical parameters or not in contrast to the classical perturbation methods which requires the existence of a small parameter in the system (in general this is not the case). According to the theory of HAM, the convergence and the rate of solution series are dependent on the convergent control parameter h. This means that this parameter gives one a convenient way to adjust and to control the convergent region of the solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it