Risk factors for the development of <i><scp>C</scp>lostridium difficile</i> infection in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A single‐center study in <scp>Q</scp>uébec, <scp>C</scp>anada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a significant complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our primary objective was to determine risk factors for the development of CDI during the first year following allo-HSCT. METHODS: A matched case-control study nested in a cohort of allo-HSCT at a single hospital in Montréal, Québec, Canada, was conducted from 2002 through 2011. RESULTS: Sixty-five of 760 patients who underwent allo-HSCT between 2002 and 2011 developed CDI, representing an incidence of 8.6%. We selected 123 controls matched for year of transplant for risk factor analyses. In the multivariable analysis, receipt of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prior to transplantation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.27), mucositis (aOR 5.90, 95% CI 2.08-16.72), and reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (aOR 6.17, 95% CI 2.17-17.57) and of other Herpesviridae viruses (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.13-8.16) were the variables that remained statistically associated with CDI. High-risk antibiotic use in the late post-transplant period (aOR 7.63, 95% CI 2.14-27.22) was associated with development of late CDI. CONCLUSION: This study revealed reactivation of CMV and other Herpesviridae viruses as novel risk factors for CDI. Administration of TMP-SMX prior to transplantation was independently associated with a decreased risk of CDI. Early and late CDI after HSCT may have distinct risk factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".