MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559852827 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2016.2615306

An Analog CVNS-Based Sigmoid Neuron for Precise Neurochips

2016· article· en· W2559852827 on OpenAlexafffund
Babak Zamanlooy, Mitra Mirhassani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsSigmoid functionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the design and implementation of an analog sigmoid neuron is presented. The activation function of the proposed neuron is implemented based on the piecewise linear approximation in the analog domain. The proposed neuron provides the required accuracy that cannot be achieved in general by analog neural network implementations. General digital outputs of a sigmoid neuron are replaced with fewer analog digits of the continuous valued number system (CVNS), while at the same time maximum approximation error is kept the same as the digital architectures. The proposed CVNS neuron resulted in an optimal ASIC implementation and is suitable for neurochips with on-chip learning. The VLSI implementation of the neuron is carried out using current-mode circuits. The implementation results compare favorably with previously developed structures in terms of area, delay, and power consumption. The proposed neuron structure occupies 28% less area compared with the state-of-the-art methods and it has two times lower power × delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207