DESIGN GRÁFICO DE IMPRESSOS EFÊMEROS – UM OLHAR SOBRE A PRODUÇÃO DE PANFLETOS ANTIGUERRA DO VIETNÃ EM SEATTLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Este artigo analisa a produção de impressos efêmeros no período da Guerra do Vietnã, bem como o seu consequente desdobramento em manifestações populares.Os métodos escolhidos para a elaboração do artigo foram a pesquisa bibliográfica e o estudo do caso dos panfletos de Seattle e a Guerra do Vietnã (Vietnam Printed Ephemera).O trabalho propõe a reflexão sobre a relevância de peças gráficas impressas e a sua representatividade na propagação de mensagens, bem como traz um levantamento histórico e definições acerca do objeto de estudo selecionado.Desse modo, é feita a análise sobre a importância de impressos e como sua autonomia pode impactar na tomada de decisões governamentais e na sociedade, por meio de ações de mobilização social.A análise proposta traz exemplos de eventos de impacto e resultados alcançados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".