Paternal Experience During The Child Hospitalization In Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The desire for a child is also a characteristic feeling of man throughout his life. However, when a premature and / or risk birth occur, require specialized care in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, parents are surprised by many difficult feelings to overcome. Objective: To understand the paternal experience during hospitalization of their child in the neonatal intensive care unit. Method: This is an exploratory-descriptive study of qualitative approach, carried out in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, through interviews, from a semi- structured instrument. It was submitted to the Content Analysis Technique, mode of cross-thematic analysis for analysis of the data. Results: The nine parents interviewed were aged between 22-39 years and the majority had not completed high school providing a monthly family income between 1 to 5.7 minimum wages. The interpretation of the results allowed the construction of the following thematic categories: Feelings paternal experienced against the hospitalization of a child in the Intensive Care Unit and faced difficulties against the hospitalization of a newborn child in Intensive Care Unit. Conclusion: Parents involved in the study demonstrated great suffering. Among the difficulties there is the lack of information from the health team and the work routine that prevents the parent to accompany the child. Such factors could be circumvented or diminished there be greater commitment on the part of health professionals to include these parents in care to be performed in infants with life- threatening and may even encourage baby's development by providing the appropriate bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".