Targeting EVI1-Overexpressing AML with Darinaparsin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4269 Ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) is a critical oncogene driving a subset of myeloid malignancies and overexpression of EVI1 predicts an extremely poor prognosis in both adult and pediatric AML patient populations. Activation of EVI1, due to chromosomal translocation, inversion or transcriptional upregulation, occurs in 8–10% of AML and results in both activation and repression of specific gene sets. Importantly, the tumor suppressor PTEN is repressed by EVI1. Arsenic trioxide targets EVI1 for degradation, suggesting that arsenicals may be effective in treating EVI1-positive malignancies. Indeed, MDS patients with EVI1 deregulation had greater benefit from the combination of arsenic trioxide (inorganic arsenic) and thalidomide than patients without EVI1 deregulation. Here, we describe the use of a novel arsenical, darinaparsin (an organic form of arsenic), to treat a patient with EVI1-overexpressing AML, as a 10th line of chemotherapy. A 36 year old woman was diagnosed with AML inv(3)(q21q26.2) where two copies of inv(3) were detected. Her initial treatment included two induction regimens followed by an allogeneic stem cell transplant. She had complete remission lasting 5 years after which time her AML relapsed. Three high dose regimens, including VP16 (4g) and cyclophosphamide (2.7g), failed to induce another remission (>80% blasts in the bone marrow). She was offered an investigational combination therapy of ribavirin and low dose cytarabine but after one month, her peripheral blast count rose to >60 and was not responding to hydrea (8g) or mitoxantrone (20mg). At this time, we compared the anti-tumor activity of arsenic trioxide and darinaparsin on the patient’s peripheral blasts in vitro and found that darinaparsin induced significantly more cell death than arsenic trioxide. Thus, the patient started darinaparsin (300 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes for 5 days every 21 days). Within 10 hours of receiving her first dose, her fever and night sweats had resolved. She regained her energy and appetite and was discharged home 2 days after her last dose. Unlike previous drug regimens, darinaparsin allowed the patient to enjoy a good quality of life for more than 30 days with an ECOG performance status of 1. Unfortunately, while darinaparsin stabilized her peripheral white blood cell counts, the patient died of extramedullary manifestations and complications of her AML, 36 days after receiving the first dose of darinaparsin. Darinaparsin decreased her peripheral white blood cell counts during the five days of treatment, which was followed by an additional decrease in the white blood cell count when serum arsenic levels were low to undetectable. We observed visible nuclear and cytoplasmic blebbing consistent with cells undergoing apoptosis. Although EVI1 protein levels were difficult to measure consistently, we analyzed the transcriptional repression activity of EVI1 by measuring PTEN mRNA expression. Intriguingly, we found a significant increase in PTEN mRNA in leukemic blasts following each course of darinaparsin, supporting the hypothesis that darinaparsin may target EVI1 or its activity. We utilized cDNA microarray expression profiling and found that gene expression of her tumor changed dramatically between the first and second cycle, including a significant increase in the pro-survival NF-κB pathway. NF-κB family member (i.e. NFKB1, 2, IA, IB, IE, RELA, TANK, TRAF1 and TRAF2) mRNA expression increased 2–8 fold following the first cycle of darinaparsin. Based on these data, we conclude that darinaparsin should be further explored as a treatment for EVI1-overexpressing myeloid malignancies using the transcriptional repression activity of EVI1 by measuring PTEN mRNA expression as a biomarker for identification of patients likely to respond to therapy. Disclosures: Mann: ZIOPHARM Oncology Inc: Research Funding. Morgan:ZIOPHARM Oncology Inc: Employment. Miller:ZIOPHARM Oncology Inc: Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".