Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling revealed minimal codeine intestinal metabolism in first‐pass removal in rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physiologically based model with segregated flow to the intestine (SFM-PBPK; partial, lower flow to enterocyte region vs. greater flow to serosal region) was found to describe the first-pass glucuronidation of morphine (M) to morphine-3β-glucuronide (MG) in rats after intraduodenal (i.d.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration better than the traditional model (TM), for which a single intestinal flow perfused the whole of the intestinal tissue. The segregated flow model (SFM) described a disproportionately greater extent of intestinal morphine glucuronidation for i.d. vs. i.v. administration. The present study applied the same PBPK modeling approaches to examine the contributions of the intestine and liver on the first-pass metabolism of the precursor, codeine (C, 3-methylmorphine) in the rat. Unexpectedly, the profiles of codeine, morphine and morphine-3β-glucuronide in whole blood, bile and urine, assayed by LCMS, were equally well described by both the TM-PBPK and SFM-PBPK. The fitted parameters for the models were similar, and the net formation intrinsic clearance of morphine (from codeine) for the liver was much higher, being 9- to 13-fold that of the intestine. Simulations, based on the absence of intestinal formation of morphine, correlated well with observations. The lack of discrimination of SFM and TM with the codeine data did not invalidate the SFM-PBPK model but rather suggests that the liver is the only major organ for codeine metabolism. Because of little or no contribution by the intestine to the metabolism of codeine, both the TM- and SFM-PBPK models are equally consistent with the data. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it