A Metal–Organic Framework Impregnated with a Binary Ionic Liquid for Safe Proton Conduction above 100 °C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To develop proton‐conducting materials under low‐humidity conditions and at moderate working temperature still remains challenging for fuel‐cell technology. Here, a new type of proton‐conducting material, EIMS‐HTFSA@MIL, which was prepared by impregnating the binary ionic liquid, EIMS‐HTFSA (EIMS=1‐(1‐ethyl‐3‐imidazolium)propane‐3‐sulfonate; HTFSA= N , N ‐bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide), into a mesoporous metal–organic framework, MIL‐101 ([Cr 3 F(H 2 O) 2 O(BDC) 3 ⋅ n H 2 O] ( n ≈0.25, BDC=1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate)) is reported. By taking advantage of the ionic‐liquid properties, such as high thermal stability, non‐volatility, non‐flammability, and low corrosivity, EIMS‐HTFSA@MIL shows potential application as a safe electrolyte in proton conduction above 100 °C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".