Resource strength and location impact of wind power on bulk electric system reliability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The characteristics of wind energy generation are different from those of conventional energy sources. The uncertainty and variability of wind power creates considerable challenges in planning and operating an electric power system while maintaining an acceptable level of reliability. The contributions of wind energy sources to the reliability of the overall power system depend on many factors, such as the strength of the wind resource, the point of wind integration in the power grid, the generation system configuration, and the topology of the transmission network, etc. Wind energy sources are typically installed at locations with strong wind regimes. Composite generation and transmission system reliability studies can be conducted to identify the optimal network locations to inject new generation that will provide maximum reliability benefit to the system. The wind regime at an optimal bus location may, however, be relatively low. This paper illustrates the reliability benefits of wind power from both resource strength and the location points of view, and the impact of wind power diversification on the bulk system reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it