MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560041048 · doi:10.1503/cjs.017315

Enabling front line–driven perioperative quality improvement through organizational infrastructure built around the Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program

2016· article· en· W2560041048 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Husein Moloo, Rebecca Brooke, Sudhir Sundaresan, Brigitte Skinner, Alan Berg, Paula Doering, James Worthington, Alan J. Forster, David Schramm

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFront lineMultidisciplinary approachQuality managementProcess managementQuality (philosophy)Organizational culturePatient safetyProcess (computing)Safety cultureUnit (ring theory)Operations managementPublic relationsManagementManagement systemHealth careBusinessComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Many surgical departments are interested in quality improvement (QI). For sustainable success, front-line involvement is crucial for improving culture. Without improved culture, any QI strategy will be a struggle. Designing an infrastructure to support these principles is important. We describe our process creating this infrastructure, the multidisciplinary teams that drive change in our department and some of the processes and outcomes we have been able to improve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207