Pedagogical Interventions: The Physics Photographs of Berenice Abbott
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la fin des années 1950, la photographe états-unienne Berenice Abbott collabore avec le Physical Science Study Committee du Massachusetts Institute of Technology créant des photographies pour un manuel de physique d’enseignement secondaire. Les images y sont mises en relation avec des graphiques et des textes afin de démontrer le fonctionnement de phénomènes tels que la gravité, le magnétisme et le mouvement des vagues. Ce genre photographique est souvent décrit comme ayant un lien direct à la nature et comme le produit d’un medium intrinsèquement « naturaliste » dispensé d’une quelconque médiation. Cependant, dans l’oeuvre de Abbott, c’est l’intervention visible de la technologie photographique et l’identification des conventions de la représentation qui permettent aux images de transmettre le savoir. Cet article analyse les stratégies utilisées par Abbott afin de remettre en question les suppositions quant au concept de naturalisme dans l’usage de la photographie dans un contexte éducatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".