An Inverse Method for Estimating the Electrochemical Parameters of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is the second part of a two part study on parameter estimation of Li-ion batteries. The methodology was developed in Part I. In Part II, the methodology is tested for LiCoO2, LiMn2O4 and LiFePO4 positive electrode materials. An inverse method combined to a simplified version of the Pseudo-two-Dimensional (P2D) model is used to identify the solid diffusion coefficients (Ds,n and Ds,p), the intercalation/deintercalation reaction-rate constants (Kn and Kp), the initial SOC (SOCn,0 and SOCp,0), and the electroactive surface areas (Sn and Sp) of Li-ion batteries. Experimental cell potentials for both low and high discharge rates provide the reference data for minimizing the objective function in the best time interval. For all cases simulated, the numerical predictions show excellent agreement with the experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".