Book Review: <i>Moral Panics, Social Fears, and the Media: Historical Perspectives</i> , edited by Siân Nicholas and Tom O’Malley
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moral Panics, Social Fears, and Media: Historical Perspectives. Siân Nicholas and Tom O'Malley, eds. New York: Routledge, 2013. 246 pp. $140 hbk.What triggers and feeds fear in society? That is challenging question addressed in Moral Panics, Social Fears, and Media, and, as title suggests, media are often culprit. Here, Siân Nicholas and Tom O'Malley have edited a worthy collection of essays that define and illustrate useful theoretical construct of moral panic, a term first coined in 1970s by Stanley Cohen, who noted, Societies appear to be subject, every now and then, to periods of moral panics. A condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests. . His idea grew out of explosion of cultural studies work of late 1960s and 1970s, especially as ideas about power and its relationship to language and discourse came to dominate a great part of debate. Of course, these social inflamed by media often result in public calls for social elites to take action that, as O'Malley noted, reflects a 'fundamentally inappropriate' response to a perceived threat. What sets this particular collection apart from contemporary applications of theory is its emphasis on past media behavior and how it effected social change, revealing that (news) media can be placed firmly at centre of historical accounts of social change and can be directed in certain ways.The book's three parts and thirteen chapters neatly delineate theoretical definitions from their application. The book's first part provides ample explanation about what constitutes a moral panic and its various transformations since Cohen's first articulation. Chas Critcher, a preeminent scholar in this area, stresses that Cohen's model and all subsequent variations are hardy and useful for studying media and media behavior over time and across national borders. However, as editors warn, blanket application of any moral panic model must be thoughtfully executed because relationship among the media, moral panics and social fears is far too complex to apply whenever social manifest themselves. The second part explores media as object of panic, and final chapters concern media promotion of social fears.The chapters concerning new media technologies as objects of fear serve to remind, as Gabriele Balbi, observed, This capacity to scare has characterized advent of all media and also (and above all) so-called new media. While Balbi's work focused on introduction of telephone in Italy, another chapter examined cinema as an object of fear, especially when its content expressed ideas that a dominant group found threatening. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".