MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560084663 · doi:10.1017/s1431927615012581

Mapping Electronic Orbitals in Real Space

2015· article· en· W2560084663 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Löffler

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic orbitalSpace (punctuation)Complete active spaceComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Mapping Electronic Orbitals in Real Space Get access Stefan Loffler Stefan Loffler Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, CanadaUniversity Service Centre for Transmission Electron Microscopy, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, AustriaInstitute of Solid State Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Microscopy and Microanalysis, Volume 21, Issue S3, 1 August 2015, Pages 2361–2362, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927615012581 Published: 23 September 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicPhotocathodes and Microchannel PlatesFrench-language works237,207