MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560133215 · doi:10.1216/rmj-2016-46-5-1587

The number of irreducible polynomials with the first two prescribed coefficients over a finite field

2016· article· en· W2560133215 on OpenAlex
Matilde Laĺın, Olivier Larocque

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsMonic polynomialFinite fieldIrreducible polynomialField (mathematics)Degree (music)Discrete orthogonal polynomialsBase (topology)Difference polynomialsCombinatoricsOrthogonal polynomialsPure mathematicsQuadratic equationDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPolynomialMathematical analysisMatrix polynomialGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use elementary combinatorial methods, together with the theory of quadratic forms, over finite fields to obtain the formula, originally due to Kuz'min, for the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree n over a finite field Fq with the first two prescribed coefficients. The formula relates the number of such irreducible polynomials to the number of polynomials that split over the base field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it