MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560133425 · doi:10.1109/mmm.2016.2616195

The Sky's the Limit: A Switchable RF-MEMS Filter Design for Wireless Avionics Intracommunication

2016· article· en· W2560133425 on OpenAlexaff
Desireh Shojaei-Asanjan, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvionicsLimit (mathematics)WirelessMicroelectromechanical systemsElectronic engineeringSkyElectrical engineeringEngineeringRadio frequencyComputer scienceAerospace engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsOptoelectronicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The switchable RF-microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) filter described in this article was presented as part of the student design competitions at the 2016 IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society (MTT-S) International Microwave Symposium held in San Francisco in May 2016. The goal of this competition, sponsored by Technical Committee MTT-21, was to design a switchable filter to separate the industrial, scientific, and medical (i.e., ISM) band (2.4-2.5 GHz) from the wireless avionics intracommunication (WAIC) band (4.2-4.4 GHz). The upcoming availability of the 4.2-4.4 GHz band for WAIC to implement wireless connectivity inside passenger aircraft cabins provided the main motivation for this design, and the filter footprint was the most important requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave MagazineSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207