MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560168061 · doi:10.1109/mascots.2016.67

Cloud-Based Spectrum Sharing in Virtual Wireless Networks

2016· article· en· W2560168061 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Shirzad, Majid Ghaderi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeuristicCloud computingDistributed computingWireless networkResource allocationWirelessTime complexityComputer networkMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the network-wide spectrum sharing problem in virtual cellular networks applicable to Cloud Radio Access Network architecture. Virtual wireless networks share network resources such as time-frequency resources on the same physical infrastructure. A critical problem is then the allocation of shared physical resources to the virtual networks so that the utilization of the resources is maximized. We formulate the problem as a linear integer maximization problem, which is shown to be NP-hard. We then develop a polynomial time heuristic algorithm called Non-balancing Spectrum Sharing (NSS), which is guaranteed to achieve a solution whose resource utilization approaches half of that of the optimal solution in the worst-case. Two additional heuristic algorithms are also proposed to improve the worst-case performance of NSS by enabling load balancing among adjacent base stations. We have simulated the proposed algorithms and the optimal algorithm under different network configurations. The simulation results confirm that i) NSS performs remarkably close to the optimal algorithm, and ii) the two other heuristic algorithms outperform NSS, and consequently are even closer to the optimal algorithm in the simulated scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207