MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560199562 · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.671203

Trauma: A Novel

2016· article· en· W2560199562 on OpenAlexaff
Devina Wadhwa, Sacha Agrawal

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Services · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)BrotherPsychoanalysisPsychologyArt historyManagementLawSociologyArtHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

is the unique perspective of Diane Cullinane's new text, Behavioral Challenges in Children With Autism and Other Special Needs: The Developmental Approach.As a board-certified developmental pediatrician with expertise in neurodevelopmental disabilities, she creates a context for understanding and treating autism, and in this case context is everything.Cullinane moves beyond diagnosis and provides a comprehensive approach to understanding behavioral challenges through the developmental process using the DIRFloortime model created by Stanley Greenspan and Serena Wieder (1), which focuses on development, individual differences, and relationships (DIR).Forming the cornerstone of this model are six essential milestones: shared attention, engagement, two-way communication, complex communication, symbolic ideas, and logical thinking.Deficits in these milestones create behavioral challenges.Cullinane's approach is presented in 11 chapters clustered into three parts: understanding behavior from a developmental perspective, challenging behavior in the moment, and creating a long-term plan.The book is written for a multidisciplinary audience, and clinicians, educators, and family members will find the straightforward, jargon-free material easy to grasp and translate into practice.However, the text stops short of addressing serious emotional disturbance comorbidity, severe behavioral compromise, and the role of medication, and the reader is left wanting more.What makes this text refreshing is the perspective of seeing problematic behavior through a different lens that looks beyond traditional applied behavior analysis where behavior is viewed within the context of function.Instead, Cullinane's work, her Developmental Approach, focuses on emotional maturation and views challenging behavior as constrictions in the development of emotional capacities.The remedy for challenging behavior is "increased affective interaction to strengthen a child's emotional development."No longer is problematic behavior the intended "target" of treatment; rather, it is the emotional skill deficit underlying the behavior.Implicit in this approach is relationship development.Cullinane provides a three-step approach for adults to manage a child's behavior in the moment: first, attune and organize; second, help; and third, resolve.She overlays these steps with the six milestones and offers pragmatic intervention recommendations, including environmental considerations, sensory interventions, structure, routines, language, and more.In addition, she recommends "safe holding strategies" for parents and clinicians to use if they must restrain children and ways to engage in a dialogue that promotes calming.Greater caveats and caution about physical intervention are indicated, because "safe holding strategies" often are not.Finally, the model includes long-term planning and methods to address deficits by practicing strategies to develop the skills and achieve milestone goals.Through case vignettes, the approach is applied to different scenarios, and the reader is brought through the treatment process, culminating with how to complete treatment.The Developmental Approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric ServicesSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207