MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Central Nervous System (CNS) Involvement with Multiple Myeloma (MM) – Longterm Survival Can Be Achieved with Radiation, Intrathecal (IT) Chemotherapy, and Immunomodulatory Agents (IMiDs),

2011· article· en· W2560219832 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Chen, Ahmed Rabea, Esther Masih‐Khan, Chia‐Min Chu, Vishal Kukreti, Suzanne Trudel, Rodger E. Tiedemann, Donna Reece

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePomalidomideMultiple myelomaInternal medicineBortezomibDiseaseOncologySurgeryGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3983 Introduction: CNS involvement with MM is uncommon, estimated at 1% of patients (pts)(Fassas 2002). CNS myeloma has a reportedly dismal prognosis with median survival of only 2 months (mos) from CNS diagnosis (Nieuwenhuizen 2007). These data derive primarily from small case reports predating the use of novel agents such as the IMiDs and bortezomib. We reviewed our institutional experience with 37 CNS myeloma pts, many treated with novel agents, specifically aiming to identify longterm survivors and their disease/treatment characteristics. Methods: From 1999 to 2010, all pts with CNS MM identified by CSF plasmacytosis and/or leptomeningeal/dural disease on imaging at our institution were reviewed. Pt demographics, disease characteristics, treatments, and survival were retrospectively reviewed from charts, pharmacy records, and a myeloma database. Survival was calculated from time of CNS disease to progression (time to progression; TTP) or death (overall survival; OS). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier method (SPSS v17.0). Results: Patient and disease characteristics:Of 758 pts diagnosed with MM at our institution over the 20 year period, 37 pts developed CNS disease (incidence 4.9%). Median age of the 37 CNS pts was 54 years (range 36–70), 51% male. A predominance of light chain subtype was noted: light chains only 32%, IgG 30%, IgA 24%, other 13%. CNS involvement was present at MM diagnosis in 9 pts (24%); at relapse in 28 pts (76%). In the relapsed pts, median number of prior therapies was 2(1–5). Median time from MM diagnosis to CNS presentation was 19.1 mos (range 4.4 weeks–11 years). Cranial nerve involvement (diplopia, facial numbness, visual blurring) was present in 24 of 37 pts (65%). Other common symptoms were headache, cognitive impairment, seizures. Fifteen pts (40%) had plasma cell leukemia (PCL) at CNS presentation. Symptomatic involvement of the orbits (11 pts; 30%) and spinal dura/epidura (17 pts; 46%) was common. Plasmacytomas of the skull adjacent to dura were seen in 65% of cases, suggesting contiguous spread. Leptomeningeal/dural enhancement or thickening on MRI was visualized in 54%, whereas parenchymal brain involvement was rare (5%). CSF plasmacytosis was reported in 24 of 34 pts tested (70%). Treatment and survival: Most pts (30/37 pts; 81%) received intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy (hydrocortisone, methotrexate, and/or cytarabine) with rapid clearance of plasma cells from CSF. Radiation was administered in 28 pts (10 craniospinal, 8 cranial only, 8 spinal only). Ten pts (30%) presented with localized CNS disease and did not require immediate systemic therapy. Various systemic therapies were used: IMiDs 16(43%), cisplatin-based (DPACE) 9(24%), bortezomib 7(19%), alkylators 5(13%), dexamethasone (DEX) alone 4(10.8%), autotransplant 1(2.7%). Consistent with the literature, median TTP from onset of CNS disease for all pts was short at 3.1 mos (95% CI 8.2–18.9). At median follow-up of 24.2 mos, median OS from CNS disease was only 4.3 mos (95% CI 3.1–5.5). However, 7 pts had prolonged survival after onset of CNS disease: 13.2, 16.1, 17.1, 34.3, 35.6, and 69.5 mos. There were no uniform laboratory or clinical features to these 7 longterm survivors. Although 2 of these pts had stable systemic disease at time of CNS onset, 3 had PCL, 5 had aggressive bone/soft tissue plasmacytomas. Three longterm survivors presented with CNS disease at time of MM diagnosis, 4 at relapse. Though all 7 underwent radiation, 6 of 7 pts received repeated IT chemotherapy (4 received maintenance IT chemotherapy every 1–2 mos), and 5 of 7 pts received thalidomide as TD (thalidomide, DEX), CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, DEX) or DTPACE (DEX, thalidomide, cisplatin, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conclusion: Although CNS disease is considered an aggressive complication of MM, in our review of 37 pts, one of the largest single-institution reports of CNS myeloma in the literature, clinical presentation and outcomes are heterogeneous. The high rate of PCL and skull-based plasmacytomas suggest that both hematogenous and contiguous spread from bone can occur. With our experience, longterm survival can be achieved with cranial/spinal irradiation, multi-dosing IT chemotherapy, and oral thalidomide, previously reported to cross the blood-brain barrier. This triple modality approach, using DPACE with or without thalidomide, is being further evaluated at our institution. Disclosures: Chen: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→