Los mayas de los Altos de Chiapas y sus vecinos occidentales: interacción, identidad e intercambio en una frontera cultural
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente estudio investiga las formas multifacéticas en que los límites políticos y las barreras sociales fueron definidas y mantenidas en la frontera occidental de la región lingüística y cultural maya. Las comparaciones del intercambio de diferentes bienes y medios pueden resaltar el grado en el que las barreras culturales fueron permeables o impenetrables en la zona fronteriza entre los mayahablantes de tzotzil de los Altos de Chiapas y sus vecinos hablantes de zoque de la Depresión Central. Las relaciones de intercambio entre ellos parecen haber sido suspendidas al final del período Postclásico Temprano, sugiriendo que la permeabilidad de la frontera occidental decreció a lo largo del tiempo, posiblemente como resultado de la llegada y expansión de los chiapanecas a la Depresión Central. Sin embargo, algunos tipos de artefactos de alto valor, como los ornamentos de metal, continuaron siendo intercambiados en esta frontera cultural.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".