Repression of telomerase gene promoter requires human‐specific genomic context and is mediated by multiple HDAC1‐containing corepressor complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The human telomerase reverse transcriptase ( hTERT ) gene is repressed in most somatic cells, whereas the expression of the mouse mTert gene is widely detected. To understand the mechanisms of this human‐specific repression, we constructed bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) reporters using human and mouse genomic DNAs encompassing the TERT genes and neighboring loci. Upon chromosomal integration, the hTERT, but not the mTert, reporter was stringently repressed in telomerase‐negative human cells in a histone deacetylase (HDAC)–dependent manner, replicating the expression of their respective endogenous genes. In chimeric BACs, the mTert promoter became strongly repressed in the human genomic context, but the hTERT promoter was highly active in the mouse genomic context. Furthermore, an unrelated herpes simplex virus‐thymidine kinase (HSV‐TK) promoter was strongly repressed in the human, but not in the mouse, genomic context. These results demonstrated that the repression of hTERT gene was dictated by distal elements and its chromatin environment. This repression depended on class I HDACs and involved multiple corepressor complexes, including HDAC1/2‐containing Sin3B, nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase (NuRD), and corepressor of RE1 silencing transcription factor (CoREST) complexes. Together, our data indicate that the lack of telomerase expression in mosthumansomaticcells results fromits repressive genomic environment, providing new insight into the mechanismof long‐recognized differential telomerase regulation in mammalian species.—Cheng, D., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, F., Russo, M., McMahon, S. B., Zhu, J. Repression of telomerase gene promoter requires human‐specific genomic context and is mediated by multiple HDAC1‐containing corepressor complexes. FASEB J. 31, 1165–1178 (2017). www.fasebj.org
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".