Analysis and Experimental Study of Magnetic-Field Amplification by a Double Coil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the amplification of the magnetic field generated by a floating coil placed in resonance with a driving coil connected to a signal source. With this method, the magnetic field can be amplified without increasing power consumption of the signal source. From an equivalent-circuit model composed of the floating and driving coils, we derived useful formulae for maximizing the magnetic-field amplitude at an arbitrary target frequency. The validity of the formulae was experimentally demonstrated. It was found that under specific conditions, the current induced in the floating coil can be increased by more than one order of magnitude compared to the current in the driving coil, leading to amplification of the magnetic field that reaches 22 dB at the target frequency of 10 MHz without increasing power consumption. We also found that the floating coil is effective in suppressing undesirable magnetic field components originating from common-mode currents. These results pave the way to further reduction of the power consumption in wireless communication schemes such as near field communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it