Guia para um programa de práticas integradas para apoiar o retorno ao trabalho e a promoção da permanência no emprego
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tradução do original publicado pelo Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (2014). Guide : soutenir le retour au travail et favoriser le maintien en emploi / Guide : to an integrated practices program for supporting a return to work and promoting job retention.http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/rg-758.pdf/ http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/rg-813.pdf .Traduzido para o português por Pedro Barros (Tikinet). Revisão da tradução: Laboratório de Investigação e Intervenção em Saúde e Trabalho (LIIST) – Curso de Terapia Ocupacional – Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (LIIST - FMUSP); autorizada publicação em português, acesso aberto na Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo 2016;27 (ed. especial).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it