High dose rate brachytherapy as a single 15 Gy fraction combined with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
66 Background: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer is commonly given in multiple fractions combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) over 5 weeks. We report results of a phase II clinical trial of single fraction HDR combined with hypofractionated EBRT over 3 weeks. Methods: Eligible patients had T1 or T2 carcinoma of the prostate with a PSA < 20 and Gleason score of 7 or less, without use of androgen deprivation. The trial accrued 125 patients with a median PSA of 6.8 ng/ml; 93% had Gleason 7. Single 15 Gy HDR was delivered to the prostate, followed 2-weeks later by EBRT to 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Patients were followed for toxicity (CTCAE v 3.0), health related quality of life (EPIC), urinary symptoms (IPSS), and clinical and biochemical control. Results: Median follow-up is 3 years (range: 1-4.5 years), with no biochemical failures. Median PSA at 3 years is 0.24 ng/ml. One of 38 biopsies at 2 years had persistent cancer. Two patients (1.6%) had acute grade 3 urinary toxicity, and median IPSS score returned to within 2 points of baseline by 3 months. The prevalence of grade 2 rectal and urinary toxicity at 2 years was 2% and 25%, respectively. Mean EPIC urinary and bowel domain scores decreased in the first 2 years, but returned to within 5 points of baseline at 3 years. Mean sexual function scores declined over the first 4 years although sexual bother scores returned to baseline at 3 years. On multivariate analysis, baseline IPSS score (p=0.0125), V100 (p=0.0002) and V200 (p=0.0141) were associated with acute grade 2 urinary toxicity. Decline in EPIC urinary quality of life domain was associated with HDR dose to 10% of urethra (p=0.0168), with a threshold of 120%. Decline in sexual scores was associated with smaller prostates and high baseline erectile functioning. Conclusions: Single fraction 15 Gy HDR combined with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy is a well tolerated and effective treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".