MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface Roughness Effects on the Fatigue Behavior of As-Machined Inconel718

2016· article· en· W2560369407 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Javadi, Walid Jomaa, Damien Texier, Myriam Brochu, Philippe Bocher

Bibliographic record

VenueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomena · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité LavalÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSurface roughnessSurface finishResidual stressBendingComposite materialAmplitudeStructural engineeringOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface finish of machined components plays a key role in their life performance. The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of different roughness parameters on high cycle fatigue behavior of Inconel718. Rotating bending fatigue tests have been performed on Inconel718 specimens with various surface roughnesses produced by turning. Height and amplitude distribution roughness parameters were investigated. Statistical analyses show that a valley material component (Mr2), as one of the amplitude distribution parameters, is the most relevant parameter for the high cycle fatigue life of machined specimens. Observations conducted at the surface of broken specimens gage length, have shown the impact of surface roughness and residual stresses on the crack propagation mode. When the roughness increases, valleys were shown to be deeper and larger, leading to a higher Mr2 value and an increase of stress concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomenaSame topicMechanical Failure Analysis and SimulationFrench-language works237,207