MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560382886 · doi:10.15353/vsnl.v1i1.45

Illumination-Guided Stereo Correspondence

2015· article· en· W2560382886 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Francis Li, Alexander Wong, John Zelek

Bibliographic record

VenueVision Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceOutlierComputer visionRobustness (evolution)MathematicsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>This work implements a method to improve correspondence matching<br />in stereo vision by using varying illumination intensities from an<br />external light source. By iteratively increasing the light intensity on<br />the scene, different parts of the scene become saturated in the left<br />and right images. These saturated areas are assumed to correspond<br />to each other, greatly reducing the search space for stereo<br />correspondence and increasing robustness to erroneous matches.<br />The stereo camera and light source used in this work is the DUO3D<br />camera by Code Laboratories. Visually, experimental results show<br />the resultant point clouds from the proposed method is less noisy<br />with fewer outliers compared to standard block matching method,<br />but produces fewer matches.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVision LettersSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207