MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560440553

5 Ways Teachers Are Opening Up the World to Special Education through Technology: Teachers Who Work with Special Needs Students Are Finding That Technology Can Not Only Broaden Their Students' Experiences but Engage Them in Learning, Help Them Retain Information, Improve Their Socialization and Boost Their Self-Esteem

2016· article· en· W2560440553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leila Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueT.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDigital Storytelling and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceSpecial educationSpecial needsWork (physics)PedagogySocializationEvent (particle physics)SociologyMathematics educationFace (sociological concept)PsychologyPolitical scienceEngineeringSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] ON WORLD Global Collaboration Day Sept. 17, 2015, students with k special needs from Finland, Sweden, Germany, South Africa and the I United States shared videos with each other introducing themselves and W their school. The event kicked off an extended online global collaboration between the called the SMARTee Project. The students use SMART Amp technology to collaborate online and teach each other about their local cultural traditions and events. The six special education teachers from around the world first met and formed the idea for the collaboration at SMART Technologies' Exemplary Educators conference last summer. While attending the conference, they found they had more in common with each other than with the general education teachers in attendance. We were talking about some of the challenges that we have compared to a general education teacher, said Brianna Owens, a special education teacher at Petroglyph Elementary School in Albuquerque, NM. We do things so differently, but special ed really does look very similar on the global scale, be it South Africa or Germany or Finland, and so we talked about how we could meet some of the challenges by having our kids work together. Other teachers around the United States and the world have also discovered the power of online global collaboration projects for students with all types of special needs. Students who have severe or multiple disabilities, those in inclusive classrooms, and those who struggle with verbal communication and face-to-face socialization are using technology to connect with all types of kids around the world and are feeling more engaged in the learning process through this inclusive online environment. Connecting Across Cultures Students in the SMARTee Project are using SMART Amp software to share their work with the other classes, create workspaces for each other to use and collaborate within a shared workspace. Owens's students taught the other classes about the Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta, an annual event featuring hundreds of hot air and gas balloons. is a project I would teach my kids every year, but this year it really took it to that next level because they had to it at a level to be able to go back and teach other students, said Owens. of the students in Owens's class have learning disabilities or other special needs such as autism that create challenges with communication and socialization, so they often use pictures and other visuals instead of spoken or written language. Owens said those communication differences can create barriers to interaction with the general education students in the school, but they actually facilitated communication with students in non-English-speaking countries because all of the students could picture communication, regardless of their language. Owens quoted Jorgen Holmberg, one of her SMARTee Project colleagues, who said, Many of the students have problems collaborating with a student sitting next to them or even talking to the kid next to them. That's a huge barrier. But with our kids it's easier for them to collaborate with a kid sitting in another country. The goal of the SMARTee project is to help the students understand their own differences but also that our similarities make us more alike than said Owens. My students on a daily basis that they're different, and not always in a positive way. This project gives them a chance to and embrace those differences and that, wow, I might be American and this student is German, but this kid looks like me or writes like me or this kid has the same disability that I have, and so they have that connecting element. Learning by Helping Others Michael Soskil is a science teacher at Wallenpaupack South Elementary School in Newfoundland, PA, and in the two previous years he worked as a curriculum coach for his district, collaborating with special and general education teachers to come up with exceptional learning experiences for the students. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueT.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in EducationSame topicDigital Storytelling and EducationFrench-language works237,207