MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560445289 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2016.2628803

Modified C/GMRES Algorithm for Fast Nonlinear Model Predictive Tracking Control of AUVs

2016· article· en· W2560445289 on OpenAlexafffund
Chao Shen, Bradley J. Buckham, Yang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeneralized minimal residual methodTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceModel predictive controlNonlinear systemResidualTracking (education)KinematicsAlgorithmControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief presents a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) method for the trajectory tracking problem of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). By augmenting the desired output trajectory to a reference dynamical system, the tracking task can fit into the standard NMPC framework, which effectively avoids possible numerical difficulties in the following fast NMPC implementation. To relieve the conflict between short sampling period and high demand of online calculation, Ohtsuka's continuation/generalized minimal residual (C/GMRES) algorithm is investigated. In order to handle the realistic constraints on the AUV thrusters, we incorporate the log barrier functions into the cost function and modify the C/GMRES algorithm. Several different reference trajectories are tested using the identified dynamic model of the Saab SeaEye Falcon open-frame ROV/AUV, which demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed fast algorithm for the AUV tracking control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologySame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207