MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2560460285 · doi:10.82308/41226

Surface to atmosphere carbon exchange in peatlands with permanent open water pools

2015· dissertation· en· W2560460285 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luc G. Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPeatAtmosphere (unit)Table (database)Environmental scienceGeographyArchaeologyMeteorologyDatabaseComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatland ecosystems are long-term net carbon (C) sinks but the open water pools that are characteristic of these temperate to subarctic wetlands have been found to be C sources to the atmosphere. Their contribution to the ecosystem level C budget has often been ignored even if they cover a significant area of the peatland surface. There is therefore a question as to whether peatlands containing pools are smaller net sinks of atmospheric C compared to peatlands without pools; the total C loss measured from pools is the same order of magnitude, but with the opposite sign, as the published average net ecosystem carbon balance for pool-free northern peatlands. In this study, I evaluated the annual C release from peatland open water pools, its impact on the net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange (NEE-CO2) and assessed the NEE-CO2 variability and controls between peatlands with different pool cover.The annual C release from pools was estimated at 103 g C m-2 yr-1, of which 15% was released during the spring ice melt. Although this estimate is within the range of other published studies, my results suggest that previous assessments of C release underestimate the annual loss by not including the spring melt release and by using sporadic measurement techniques. The ecosystem scale measurements performed using the eddy covariance technique (EC) showed that the 30-min maximum CO2 uptake rates decreased by close to 25% for an increase in pool fraction within the EC tower source area from 0-10% to 20-30%. I found that pools lower the overall NEE-CO2 components (maximum photosynthetic uptake and ecosystem respiration rates) by reducing the ecosystem's aboveground vegetation biomass. The lower total vegetation biomass at the ecosystem scale reduced net CO2 uptake during the day but also reduced ecosystem respiration (ER) at night, as ER from the pools is mainly heterotrophic. The net effect was that the site remained a sink for CO2 during the measurement period despite the inclusion of pools. When comparing sites with different pool cover fraction and climate, I observed significant variability in NEE-CO2 and its components between sites, and found that biophysical controls on CO2 exchange previously identified for vegetated surface peatlands (leaf area index, plant functional type) apply to peatlands containing open-water pools. Overall, my results demonstrate that peatland open water pools can play a significant role in the ecosystem level surface to atmosphere C exchange. Measurements of interannual NEE-CO2 variability from different peatlands with pools will expand the validity of these findings. Future studies should also include an evaluation of the annual CH4 exchange, CO2 loss during the winter along with dissolved organic carbon export from peatland with pools in order to obtain a complete net ecosystem carbon balance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→