MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560467566 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2016-0315

Phreatic line calculation and stability analysis of slopes under the combined effect of reservoir water level fluctuations and rainfall

2016· article· en· W2560467566 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guanhua Sun, Yongtao Yang, Shengguo Cheng, Hong Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhreaticThree gorgesLandslideGeologyGeotechnical engineeringWater levelSlope stabilityLine (geometry)Factor of safetyGroundwaterGeometryMathematicsAquifer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rainfall and reservoir water level fluctuations are the main external factors of landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. To improve the analysis of slope stability under the combined effect of reservoir water level fluctuations and rainfall, a simplified method for phreatic line calculation of slopes is proposed in this study. Based on the obtained phreatic line, the expression of normal stress on the sliding surface of the slope under the hydrodynamic forces is deduced, and a global analysis method to solve the slope safety factor under hydrodynamic force is proposed. Finally, the safety evolution of a slope in the Three Gorges Reservoir area is studied under the combined effect of reservoir water level fluctuations and rainfall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207