MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560482770 · doi:10.1109/epec.2016.7771737

Optimal power flow with demand participation of RESs

2016· article· en· W2560482770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationRenewable energySemidefinite programmingGridComputer sciencePower flowRegular polygonRelaxation (psychology)Economic dispatchConvex optimizationSmart gridOptimization problemElectric power systemPower (physics)MathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper is concerned with a semidefinite program (SDP) to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problem for integrating renewable energy sources (RESs) with demand participation in electric grids. The electric generation from renewables as a supplier is randomly realized using an algorithm. The demand participation is provided by demand-side resources with renewables to curtail the actual loads, which means that the penetration of renewable generation is raised. Thus, a balance between supply and demand response of the grid is maintained. The optimization problem, accommodating the renewable generation, is introduced as a convex problem. The convex problem is represented in the form of semidefinite program. Due to the nonconvexity of the optimal power flow problem, convex semidefinite relaxation has been proposed to solve the optimization problem. We also perform contingency scenarios and test these scenarios by solving the semidefinite relaxation to obtain feasible solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207