MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560552866 · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2016.12.004

Generation and characterization of human iPSC line MML-6838-Cl2 from mobilized peripheral blood derived megakaryoblasts

2016· article· en· W2560552866 on OpenAlexaff
Marten Hansen, Eszter Varga, Tatjana Wüst, Nelleke P.M. Brouwer, Hugues Beauchemin, Clemens Mellink, Anne-Marie Van Der Kevie-Kersemaekers, Tarik Möröy, Bert van der Reijden, Marieke von Lindern, Emile van den Akker

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyReprogrammingInduced pluripotent stem cellFlow cytometryCD34Molecular biologyCell culturePopulationGene silencingGerm layerImmunophenotypingCell biologyStem cellCellGeneticsGeneEmbryonic stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) CD34+ cells were cultured to CD41+/CD34+ megakaryoblasts. Cells were sorted to obtain a pure megakaryoblast population that was reprogramed by a hOKSM self-silencing polycistronic vector using lentiviral delivery. The generated induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines were tested for silencing of the reprogramming construct by flow cytometry. Pluripotency of MML-6838-Cl2 iPSC line was confirmed by expression of associated markers and by in vivo spontaneous differentiation towards the 3 germ layers. The genomic integrity of iPSC line was shown by karyotyping. The MML-6838-Cl2 iPSC is, to our knowledge, the first to be generated from megakaryoblasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ResearchSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207