A Complete Structural Inventory of the Mycobacterial Microcompartment Shell Proteins Constrains Models of Global Architecture and Transport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial microcompartments are bacterial analogs of eukaryotic organelles in that they spatially segregate aspects of cellular metabolism, but they do so by building not a lipid membrane but a thin polyhedral protein shell. Although multiple shell protein structures are known for several microcompartment types, additional uncharacterized components complicate systematic investigations of shell architecture. We report here the structures of all four proteins proposed to form the shell of an uncharacterized microcompartment designated the Rhodococcus and Mycobacterium microcompartment (RMM), which, along with crystal interactions and docking studies, suggests possible models for the particle's vertex and edge organization. MSM0272 is a typical hexameric β-sandwich shell protein thought to form the bulk of the facet. MSM0273 is a pentameric β-barrel shell protein that likely plugs the vertex of the particle. MSM0271 is an unusual double-ringed bacterial microcompartment shell protein whose rings are organized in an offset position relative to all known related proteins. MSM0275 is related to MSM0271 but self-organizes as linear strips that may line the facet edge; here, the presence of a novel extendable loop may help ameliorate poor packing geometry of the rigid main particle at the angled edges. In contrast to previously characterized homologs, both of these proteins show closed pores at both ends. This suggests a model where key interactions at the vertex and edges are mediated at the inner layer of the shell by MSM0271 (encircling MSM0273) and MSM0275, and the facet is built from MSM0272 hexamers tiling in the outer layer of the shell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".