MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560571808 · doi:10.1139/er-2016-0063

Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated saline soils using halophytes: current progress and future perspectives

2016· article· en· W2560571808 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lichen Liang, Weitao Liu, Yuebing Sun, Xiaohui Huo, Song Li, Qixing Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersProgram for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in UniversityUniversity of California, San DiegoNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhytoremediationHalophyteEnvironmental sciencePhytoextraction processHuman decontaminationSalinitySoil salinitySoil waterPollutantEnvironmental chemistryHyperaccumulatorEcologyBiologyWaste managementSoil scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil salinity is a destructive environmental stressor that greatly reduces plant growth and productivity. In recent years, large tracts of farmland in arid and semiarid regions have been simultaneously affected by salinity and heavy metal pollution, arousing widespread environmental concern. Phytoremediation, defined as the use of plants to remove pollutants from the environment and (or) to render them harmless, is a low cost, environmentally friendly, and effective method for the decontamination of soils polluted by heavy metals. Halophytes, which can survive and reproduce in high-salt environments, are potentially ideal candidates for phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated saline soils. In this review, we discuss the current progress on the use of halophytes, their tolerance mechanisms to salt and heavy metal toxicity, and their potential for phytoremediation in heavy metal contaminated saline soils. The relative mechanisms are discussed and the future perspectives are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207