Bibliographic record
Abstract
En temps de paix, en Europe, la chevre fait majoritairement partie de la basse-cour et donc de l'ecnomie feminine. En temps de guerre et plus particulierement lors de celle de 14-18, quels sont les usages de la gent caprine -vivante ou morte- passee du cote masculin? L'usage symbolique du bouc est ambivalent: positif comme mascotte institutionnelle de regiments canadiens ou britanniques, ou negatif pour personnifier l'ennemi, le Boche. Mais la multiplication des chevres adoptees comme mascottes occasionnelles, et ce dans toutes les armees, depasse le symbolique. La chevre permet ainsi aux soldats de renouer avec le vivant, avec les animaux de leur ferme, avec le monde familial et feminin, avec la paix; une presence de substitution au sens reel et metaphorique. La deuxieme partie de l'etude est consacree a un phenomene relevant du pittoresque et de l'exceptionnel: l'importation de dizaines de milliers de chevres afin de subvenir a la nourriture rituelle des troupes anglo-indiennes ou hindoues, tout comme les troupes indigenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".