The Spectre in the Archive: Truth, Reconciliation, and Indigenous Archival Memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article places archival science, Indigenous studies, and critical theories on race and colonialism in dialogue so as to explore two court cases related to records and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Canada. It questions on what basis the courts would rule that some records were to be produced, others temporarily preserved, and yet others destroyed. Considering recent scholarship calling for a shift from a human rights and diversity rhetoric in the archival conversation, I argue that the discursive disappearance or spectralization of Indigenous people plays a crucial role in dispossessing them of their lands, resources, and cultural heritage. Noting the tensions between a desire to be remembered and a longing for oblivion, I argue that the incorporation of records by or about Indigenous people into the national settler archival repository is crucial for the constitution of a settler historical archival memory (at the expense of an Indigenous one) that transforms Canadian national shame and guilt into national glory and honour. Conceptualizing the Canadian national archive as a haunted site of fear and desire, national guilt and national triumph, I show how the histories of colonial violence are revealed or brought to the fore by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission court cases. RÉSUMÉCet article place la science archivistique en dialogue avec les études autochtones et les théories raciales critiques afin d’explorer deux cas de cour liés aux documents d’archives et à la Commission de vérité et réconciliation au Canada. Il examine sur quelle base la cour pouvait conclure que certains documents devaient être produits, d’autres conservés de façon temporaire, et d’autres encore, détruits. En tenant compte des études récentes qui préconisent un changement de la rhétorique au sujet des droits humains et de la diversité dans le discours archivistique, je soutiens que la disparition discursive ou la « spectralisation » des peuples autochtones joue un rôle crucial dans le processus de dépossession de leurs terres, de leurs ressources et de leur héritage culturel. En prenant note des tensions qui existent entre le désir d’être inscrit dans la mémoire et l’envie d’être oublié, j’affirme que l’incorporation de documents créés par des peuples autochtones ou à leur sujet dans les archives nationales du colonisateur demeure cruciale à la constitution de la mémoire historique archivistique de ce dernier (au détriment d’une mémoire historique archivistique autochtone), qui transforme la honte et la culpabilité nationales canadiennes en gloire et honneur nationaux. En conceptualisant le centre d’archives national canadien comme un lieu hanté par la crainte et le désir, et par la culpabilité et le triomphe nationaux, je montre comment les cas de cour de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation révèlent ou mettent en évidence les histoires de violence coloniale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.055 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".