The Currencies of Naturalism in Dutch Pronk Still-Life Painting: Luxury, Craft, Envisioned Affluence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En tant que mode de représentation, le naturalisme des natures mortes ostentatoires néerlandaises du XVII e siècle suscite un désir consumériste. Pourtant, comme le mot l’indique, le naturalisme vise la représentation d’objets, de figures, et d’espaces d’une manière qui imite la réalité. Comment les pronkstilleven peuvent-elles prétendre à la vérité de la représentation naturaliste en même temps qu’elles incarnent le luxe, une forme de plaisir personnel déterminé par la valeur sociale ? Pour répondre à cette question, cet essai poursuit trois pistes de réflexion : le statut de la représentation naturaliste comme produit de luxe, les tensions entre l’artisanat et le travail dans ces tableaux, et enfin les distinctions entre l’abondance et l’affluence codifiée dans le naturalisme néerlandais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".