Interaction Detection in Egocentric Video: Toward a Novel Outcome Measure for Upper Extremity Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to develop effective interventions for restoring upper extremity function after cervical spinal cord injury, tools are needed to accurately measure hand function throughout the rehabilitation process. However, there is currently no suitable method to collect information about hand function in the community, when patients are not under direct observation of a clinician. We propose a wearable system that can monitor functional hand use using computer vision techniques applied to egocentric camera videos. To this end, in this study we demonstrate the feasibility of detecting interactions of the hand with objects in the environment from egocentric video. The system consists of a preprocessing step where the hand is segmented out from the background. The algorithm then extracts features associated with hand-object interactions. This includes comparing motion cues in the region near the hand (i.e., where the object is most likely to be located) to the motion of the hand itself, as well as to the motion of the background. Features representing hand shape are also extracted. The features serve as inputs to a random forest classifier, which was tested with a dataset of 14 activities of daily living as well as noninteractive tasks in five environment (total video duration of 44.16 min). The average F-score for the classifier was 0.85 for leave-one-activity out in our dataset set and 0.91 for a publicly available set (1.72 min) when filtered with a moving average. These results suggest that using egocentric video to monitor functional hand use at home is feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".