Fracture characteristics of laboratory-tested soda lime glass specimens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Static testing of glass plates has shown a pronounced distribution in the plate strength. The origin of fracture location along the plate span, the corresponding critical tensile stress, and the size of the critical flaw at the origin of fracture are failure characteristics of major importance. This paper provides data and insight into parameters influencing these failure characteristics through laboratory testing and analysis of soda lime glass, to find a rationale behind the observed disorder of their magnitudes and distributions. A recent stochastic model for glass plate analysis is implemented to predict the magnitudes and distributions of the failure characteristics, and to compare these with laboratory tests. The model provides good predictions of the distributions and magnitudes of the failure characteristics and sheds light on glass plate behaviour. It demonstrates that there are mechanics-based explanations to the wide scatter of experimental results and to the apparent disorder in glass behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it