MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560676109 · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2637302

Design, Control, and Experimental Test of an Open-Winding IPM Synchronous Motor

2016· article· en· W2560676109 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Sedigh Toulabi, John Salmon, Andrew M. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersElectromagnetic coilCapacitorInverterAC powerSynchronous motorPower (physics)AC motorControl theory (sociology)VoltageEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A concentrated winding interior permanent-magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) capable of being used in wide speed range applications is designed and introduced. The IPMSM in the study is capable of being operated either from a single supply or from two converters in an open winding configuration. In this study, the phase windings are open connected to two separate voltage source converters: a dc-supplied main bridge, capable or supply real and reactive power, and a floating bridge (FB), connected to a capacitor and only capable of supplying reactive power to the motor. Vector diagram analysis and two-dimensional finite-element analysis (FEA) are presented to illustrate the extension of the capabilities of the IPMSM compared to the usual Y connection. The open winding IPMSM is built and performance experimentally investigated over a wide range of speeds. The results demonstrate 10-15% higher power capability using an open winding and FB, compared to the single inverter drive by experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207