<i>Fighting for the Soul of Germany: The Catholic Struggle for Inclusion after Unification</i>, by Rebecca Ayako Bennette
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fighting for the Soul of The Catholic Struggle for Inclusion after Unification, by Rebecca Ayako Bennette. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2012. xii, 368 pp. $ 49.95 US (cloth). Many German Catholics found it difficult to wholeheartedly embrace the incarnation of the German nation created by Otto von Bismarck. They had dreamed of a Germany that included largely Catholic Austria. Instead Bismarck's small German solution was overwhelmingly Protestant. The new emperor was the formal head of the Evangelical Church of Prussia, and Protestants dominated the army, the civil service and universities. Identification with the new Germany became even more challenging for Catholics when Bismarck and his political allies unleashed the Kulturkampf. It would have been understandable if German Catholics had turned en masse against the Protestant-dominated German state. Equally understandable is that historians have paid much more attention to the Catholic subculture and its struggle against Kulturkampf legislation than to their efforts to become part of the new nation. Rebecca A. Bennette convincingly argues that Catholics actually went to great lengths to embrace and define Germany. Bennette's monograph comprises two distinct parts. The first begins with a discussion of the German question and its religious aspects before unification. Events such as the Cologne Troubles, a dispute over the confessional upbringing of children, the Wartburg national festival (1817) celebrating Luther's break with the papacy, the romantic nationalism with its evocation of medieval splendor and Bavaria's King Ludwig's Vallhalla project as well as the 1848 revolution showed the possibilities and limits of cross-confessional (p. 19) in nation building. The more important chapters of part one, deal with Catholic attitudes during the beginning of the German epoch, between the Prussian defeat of Austria and the end of the Kulturkampf. By closely reading the diverse Catholic press and analysing the annual Katholikentage, Bennette identifies four distinct phases during which Catholic identification with Germany moved from initial cautious optimista and a willingness to become part of the new Germany to uncertainty about having a real future in the Reich (p. 42). During the most intense phase of the Kulturkampf (1875-77), some Catholics saw an opportunity for cooperation with conservative Protestants. As proof of their Germanness they joined the vociferous chorus of anti-Semitic rhetoric. While anti-Semitic rabble-rousing was opposed by prominent Center politicians such as Ludwig Windthorst and the Kolnische Volkszeitung, Germany's second most important Catholic daily, virtually all Catholic newspapers and the various factions of the Center Party, agreed on the dangers of Socialism. Bennette interprets Catholics' anti-Semitic and anti-socialist rhetoric as demonstrations that they were true Germans and that an increasing closeness between Catholics and the Kaiser existed (p. 64). The end of the conflict posed a new dilemma. Catholic solidarity forged during Kulturkampf was threatened once its vigour waned. As a consequence, Bennette argues, the Center broadened its political focus beyond religious questions, moving closer to other political parties and embracing the Kaiserreich rather than Catholic politics. In the second more original part of the book Bennette takes a topical approach. In turn, she investigates Catholics' conceptualization of their place in Germany's regions and her capital, the use of feminine imagery in their construction of the German nation, Catholic contributions to German education and science, and finally, Catholic ideas of the Kaiserreich's place on the world stage. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".