MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560716322 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.3.479

<i>The Invention of Law in the West</i>, by Aldo Schiavone, translated by Jeremy Carden and Anthony Shugaar

2013· article· en· W2560716322 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lionel Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Invention of Law in the West, by Aldo Schiavone, translated by Jeremy Carden and Anthony Shugaar. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2012. x, 624 pp. $49.95 US (cloth). In this book, the very learned Aldo Schiavone tells the story of how the Roman jurists, over a period of centuries, created, discovered, or--as the title would suggest --invented law, as law is understood in the West. The story is both fascinating and profoundly important. The creation of a legal system occurred only twice in the West, and it happened first in Rome. Roman law still lives today. All over the world, and especially on the Continent, there are legal systems known as civilian, a label that tells us that their basic private law--the law of property, contracts, and of the family--is descended from the ius civile, the Roman law for Roman citizens. And Roman law lives even in legal systems that descend from another invention, which took place in London over a thousand years later. The basic grammar of private law in all Western systems--the organizing concepts of ownership, obligation, debtor and creditor, wrongful harm, the enforcement of promises, and so on--was created by the Roman jurists. How this happened, and why it happened, are questions of enduring significance, and Schiavone's book makes an important contribution to our understanding. The development and evolution of the law generally takes place over very long periods of time. Milsom warned that the importance of such long periods is one of the reasons why it is easy to misinterpret legal history [see S.F.C. Milsom, A Natural History of the Common Law (New York, 2003), pp. xix-xxii]. Moreover, in the study of how Roman law came to be, it must be remembered that the most interesting things .about Roman law are not the parts that are tied to the particularities of Roman society. The law of slavery, the patriarchal nature of Roman family law, the physical recourse that a creditor could have against the body of his debtor: these are of interest only to the specialist. The elements that are of interest to every jurist are the ones that turned out to be timeless, and relevant to every Western society: the basic concepts of private law that have already been mentioned. Schiavone is fully aware of both of these issues. His project deserves praise in that it does not fall into a trap of merely identifying law with power, and thence of trying to understand the evolution of Roman law as the deployment and development of this power. Roman law was not just politics by another name (for example, pp. 172-73, 200); a system of that kind could not possibly have had the subsequent history--we might say, the subsequent success all over the world--that Roman law has had. Schiavone rightly takes a long view of his subject matter, starting at the very foundation of Rome. He focuses on crucial stages in the development of the law, from a mysterious normative order that was a part of religious belief, to an abstract form of normative reasoning that is recognizable to the modern jurist of any tradition. These stages still resonate today: articulation of reasons, justifications for rules and for the outcomes of cases, and the concomitant abstraction of reasoning from particular disputes that leads to the evolution of powerful and general normative ideas like obligation and ownership. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207