MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560724134 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58431-1_6

One Must Invent: Tactical Aesthetics and Imperfect Design

2016· book-chapter· en· W2560724134 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Balaisis

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImperfectAestheticsMovie theaterRhetoricRhetorical questionSociologyPolitical scienceArtVisual artsLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Balaisis draws important attention to the legacy of imperfect cinema in contemporary film, digital media, and design practice. Outlining what he calls tactical aesthetics and imperfect design, Balaisis discusses strategies used by Cubans in the post-Soviet period to extend the life cycle of various commodities and create new household items from discarded objects. He also examines the curatorial and critical work of Cuban industrial designer Ernesto Oroza, mapping the influence of Cuban film theory from the 1960s on contemporary aesthetic theory and design practice in Cuba. He situates these practices within the discursive and rhetorical history of industrialism and innovation in Cuba, as well as within emerging international discourses on “making” and maker culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207