MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560789657 · doi:10.1109/pmaps.2016.7764136

Cumulant-based probabilistic load flow analysis of wind power and electric vehicles

2016· article· en· W2560789657 on OpenAlexaff
Pouya Amid, Curran Crawford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicMonte Carlo methodReliability (semiconductor)Wind powerComputer scienceProbabilistic analysis of algorithmsPower-flow studyCumulantRandom variablePower (physics)GridElectric power systemMathematical optimizationReliability engineeringProbability distributionAC powerVoltageEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Probabilistic Load Flow (PLF) analysis is becoming an important part of grid design, optimization and operation due to the uncertainties added to the power network from both the generation and consumption sides. A reliable, fast and robust mathematical method for such analyses is the main step in such development. The conventional deterministic Monte Carlo (MC) analysis, though simple in implementation, becomes too slow as the networks become more complex. In this study, a new Cumulant-based method is used to assess power flows. The Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs) of the load are generated in addition to the unpredictable power resources such as wind power generation or charging demand of electric cars. Furthermore, the possible correlation between input random variables is added to the analysis. Using one of the IEEE standard networks as the case study, the capabilities and reliability of the method are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207