In the Presence of Each Other: A Pedagogy of Storytelling by Johanna Kuyvenhoven.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Johanna Kuyvenhoven begins her book by clearly defining what she means by storytelling.She states, "When I write about storytelling I mean telling.It's an act in which a person speaks a story from memory to a listener or group of listeners" (p.3).This definition provides an important base for framing Kuyenhoven's ensuing description of her journey using storytelling as a teaching method.Kuyvenhoven then outlines the content of each chapter in the book and how each contributes to the development of A Pedagogy of Storytelling.She ends her introduction with "This was the learning that happened in a portable classroom, in a circle gathered around a storyteller and in each other's presence" (p. 7).This statement aptly sets the scene for Kuyvenhoven's experiences, descriptions of which comprise the rest of the book.Johanna Kuyvenhoven tells the story of her research as just that: a story.This book provides a refreshing approach to reporting on research.Kuyvenhoven explains her choice of writing in this style:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".