MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560818228 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22753

A soft sensor for the sulphur dioxide converter in an industrial smelter

2016· article· en· W2560818228 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Jianjun He, Junfeng Zhang, Helen Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSmeltingSulfur dioxideSoft sensorSulfurEnvironmental scienceCatalytic converterChemistryMetallurgyWaste managementMaterials scienceCatalysisInorganic chemistryEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In metal productions from sulphide ores, sulphur dioxide (SO2) is generated when the ore concentrate is smelted. To minimize emission of SO2 to the atmosphere, sulphuric acid plants are used to convert SO2 gas into sulphuric acid product in smelters. A SO2 to sulphur dioxide (SO3) converter, where SO2 is oxidized to SO3 with the help of catalyst, is the key unit in a sulphuric acid plant. For monitoring the converter, temperature of the reactor is extensively measured at various locations, but the concentration of SO2 is barely measured or only measured at very limited points due to the difficulty and costs involved. In this paper, a soft sensor is developed to estimate the conversion ratio and concentration of SO2. The soft sensor is derived based on the steady state mass balance model of the converter and dynamic data analysis. From the proposed soft sensor, conversion ratio and concentration of SO2 can be estimated from available industrial real‐time measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207