Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une manière de penser la subjectivité sociale et de repérer les effets de la réalité quotidienne dans le matériel clinique. On constate que certains concepts psychanalytiques classiques sont en crise et ont perdu la place centrale qu’ils occupaient, pour la raison majeure qu’ils doivent cohabiter avec de nouveaux concepts. Ceci a de nombreuses conséquences, comme d’avoir affaire à deux logiques superposées. L’une correspond strictement au monde intérieur du sujet singulier, et l’autre tient compte de la place qu’occupe le Lien, c’est-à-dire la relation entre deux ou plusieurs sujets. Les concepts qui correspondent à chacune de ces deux logiques sont par exemple la représentation et la présentation, l’identification et l’imposition, le transfert et l’interférence, la transmission généalogique et la transmission inversée, l’interprétation et l’intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".