LA CONSTRUCTION SOCIALE DE LA FIGURE DE LECTRICE ET DE SA CONTRE-FIGURE MASCULINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’aide de deux enquêtes ethnographiques, l’article montre comment la construction sociale de la lecture est genrée. Par les représentations concurrentes et exclusives que cette construction sociale normative impose, elle écrase la figure du lecteur homme et, encore plus en amont, la figure du lecteur garçon (adolescent et jeune). En milieu rural comme dans le quartier de la banlieue défavorisée urbaine, l’image et le discours sur la lecture sont réservés aux filles, et les rares garçons et hommes lecteurs, catégorisés comme artistes, intellectuels ou militants, doivent trouver des stratégies d’esquive, de déguisement et d’instrumentalisation de la lecture pour pouvoir afficher cet état ; car, tout comme en milieu rural, la solitude choisie est un comportement connoté au féminin. Alors, à quelle culture l’acte de lecture renvoie-t-il les garçons/hommes ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".