MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560916169 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v6n1p111

Statistical Study of Monthly Rainfall Trends by Using the Transmuted Power Lindley Distribution

2016· article· en· W2560916169 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniele Cristina Tita Granzotto, Josmar Mazucheli, Francisco Louzada

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMathematicsOrder statisticQuantileStatisticsBathtubMonte Carlo methodApplied mathematicsRank (graph theory)Quantile functionPower functionCumulative distribution functionProbability density functionMathematical analysisCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we generalize the power Lindley distribution using aquadratic rank transmutation map to develop a transmuted power Lindley distribution. The new distribution exhibits, in addition to decreasing, increasing and bathtub hazard rate, depending on its parameters also unimodal hazard rate. A comprehensive mathematical properties of this distribution is provided. Some expressions for the moments, order statistics, quantiles function are derived. The model parameters are estimated by the maximumlikelihood method. A Monte Carlo experiment on the finite sample behavior of the MLEs is performed. A real climatological data set was used in order to show the applicability of the new model and different statistics of fit were used as selection criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207